By Christopher Norris
Enlightenment is man’s release from his self-incurred tutelage. Tutelage is man’s inability to make use of his understanding without direction from another. This tutelage is self-incurred when its cause lies not in lack of reason but in lack of resolution and courage to use it without direction from another. Sapere aude! ‘Have courage to use your own reason!’- that is the motto of enlightenment.
Immanuel Kant, ‘An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?’
The worst illiterate is the political illiterate, he doesn’t hear, doesn’t speak, nor participate in political events. He doesn’t know that the price of the bean, of the fish, of the flour, of the rent, of shoes and of medicine, all depend on political decisions . . . . From his political ignorance is born the prostitute, the abandoned child, and the worst thieves of all, the bad politician, corrupt flunky of the national and multinational companies.
Bertolt Brecht
Before it happened you were in no doubt.
‘Unthinkable’ you said, and then,
Lest they suspect you’d not quite ruled it out,
‘Just inconceivable’, again.
‘Again’, I wrote, but let’s not be too quick:
Those words ‘think’ and ‘conceive’ don’t mean
The same thing, and we’re apt to miss a trick
By suturing the gap between.
Of course you’ll say it’s just semantic stuff,
All this, and the last thing we need
When you’ve real-world catastrophes enough
For ‘act, then think’ to be your creed.
Yet ask yourself: which line’s the one to take
When those wise-after-the-event
Types say: ‘It’s happened, so you’d better make
Think-room for how things really went’.
Well, you can either field it with a flat
Though feeble apologia: ‘got
Things wrong that time, alas!’, or try to bat
It back with a semantic shot.
Then you might say: yes, sure enough, ‘conceive’
Trump president I can and must
Since it’s a claim that’s true, that I believe,
And that has duly earned my trust.
That’s knowledge as it figures on the view
Proposed with sundry minor tweaks
From Plato down, though lately just a few
Have differed with the ancient Greek’s
Account of it. Still, you lot have no choice
But to conceive the man as now
Your sworn-in president despite the voice
Inside you that just won’t allow
The thought. For thinking brings a sharpened sense
Of that rock-bottom line below
Which politics can’t sink lest it dispense
With all the semblances that go
To keep the folk on board. That’s why I say
You needn’t feel the wise-guy’s won
Or pipe down when the hindsight-seers play
Their cynic games by making fun
Of you for thinking it ‘unthinkable’ that such
A bunch of rogues and fools should come
To occupy high office. There’s a much
More hopeful way than acting dumb
And that’s to say that lots of things we thought
Or think could never happen did
Or do, which means reality falls short
Or fails to match our starting bid
By throwing up some Bullingdon buffoon
As Foreign Secretary, or fool
Like Donald Trump as fittest to fine-tune
The harmony of states. Then you’ll
Do best to keep in mind the point that ‘think’
And ‘know’ are words that come apart
Most truth-revealingly when any link
Between them’s always apt to start
A thought-rebellion as it twists and snaps
Under the strain. If you apply
Yourself you’ll find out the truth-value gaps
That show up where the facts defy
All presentations that would have them square
With thought’s demand, or all the best
State-sponsored tricks and ruses to repair
Those tell-tale cracks. Then every test
For truth that’s thinkable as well as borne
Out by appealing to some fact
Or other is the surest way to warn
The populace that what they’ve lacked
Thus far is means or motive to enquire
Why crooks and fools so often reach
High office. Then they’ll see how things conspire
So often as if meant to teach
A crash-course in the need for you to steer
Not only by the guiding lights
Of factual truth but by what first comes clear
When knowledge of that sort unites
With thought’s refusal ever to accept
A bad reality as all
There is of truth. It’s by that lie we’re kept
From seeing how far short they fall,
Those villains of this latter age whose sole
Distinction is to far surpass
All previous contenders for the role
Of most corrupt or else outclass
The Borgias and the Krays in every vice
That flesh is heir to. Still they tend
To fester worst, as Trump and Co. suffice
To show, most often through the blend
Of those twin motives, greed for power and lust
For all its cash-back benefits,
That make the turn to politics a must
For any billionaire whose fortune hits
A satisfaction-ceiling. Then he feels
A growing need to exercise
The kind of power that brooks no vain appeals
To business-law but just relies
On getting cronies into place who’ll fix
The rules through a Supreme Court that’s
Itself so packed with cronies (politics
And wealth checked out: all plutocrats)
That your incumbent Pres need entertain
No fear that rule of law might thwart
His family business in its plans to gain
More wealth with their confirmed support.
Just think of this, then think how much it hurts,
That sense of a reality at odds
Not only with what counts as ‘just deserts’
Or once was deemed to please the gods
But with each latest thought-affront that tells
Us, in reflective mode, that there’s
More to reality than that which spells
Out what’s the case yet hardly bears
Such dwelling on. For if it once became
Your habit to keep well in mind
And each time thinkingly review what shame
Those home-truths of a factual kind
Had brought upon you citizens who let
The perpetrators bring it off,
That veritable coup d’état, and get
Themselves safely in place to scoff
At you poor suckers then the chances are
The thought would either drive you mad
With the injustice of it all or jar
On any remnant faith you had
In their ‘democracy’. Then you’d resolve
To pass from thought to act and strive
To square the two, although this might involve
No end of failures to arrive
At other life-goals that required no loss
Of those life-chances premised on
Your up-to-now unwillingness to cross
A certain line. So you’d have gone
Along with conscience and its sudden urge
To strive at last against the old
Conformist drive that recommends we merge
Our purposes with what we’re sold
As virtue by some gang of thieves installed
In the White House or other seats
Of power world-wide. Time, then, to do what’s called
Thought-crime by them and say it meets
The needs of truth and justice only if
Its counter-push against the pull
Of habit and self-interest’s not a tiff
In thought alone but takes the bull
Straight by the horns and vows to overturn
All those unthinkably bad states
Of factual circumstance. From which you learn
What kind of action best translates
Your outrage into something Marx would count
As truly setting out to change
The world, not spinning ideas that amount
To just one tick-box in the range
Of world-interpretations. These then serve
Most usefully to help deflect
More thought-brigades from working up the nerve
To think with practical effect,
Reject the given, emphasize the rift
Between plain fact and thought’s demand,
And so bring better times within the gift
Of you who seek to understand
More adequately how you’ve all been screwed
By those in power. It’s this that made
So many give up fighting and conclude
That there’s too high a price that’s paid,
By their sort mostly, when the facts confront
A counterfactual realm of hope
Renewed. Let’s grant, you’d better make a blunt
Assessment of how far its scope
For action’s always subject to the check
Of a shrewd reckoning that takes
Due stock of stubborn facts that might just wreck
Its long-term project. Where the stakes
Are highest is where commonsense insists
Most loudly, since with all the force
Of thought repressed, that only fabulists
Or crazed ideologues endorse
The notion that mere mindfulness might bring
A switch of some world-aspect as
It strikes the thinker, then new hopes that spring
In quick response, and then what has
The power of energizing thought and will
To act in their pursuit. So don’t
Give up that word ‘unthinkable’, or drill
Yourself in fact-routines that won’t,
Since close-patrolled, allow for thought’s revolt
Against contingent evils. Keep
In mind how thinkers sometimes need a jolt
To wake them from the placid sleep
Of reason or of propositions framed
In forms that perfectly accord
With logic’s rule. Thus Aristotle named
Them ‘practical’, those smorgasbord-
Type syllogisms that were rightly classed
Among the licit kinds despite
Their purely formal defects since they passed,
In rational if not in tight-
Linked logical array, from certain facts
About the world to certain ways
In which to view and justify such acts
As follow when we reappraise
The case more thoughtfully. Again, this goes
To make my point: that facts which rank
Below what’s thinkable – concerning those,
Let’s say, who ultimately bank
On moneyed interest and on sheer extent
Of public ignorance to hide
Their guilt – are facts that amplify dissent,
Or should, until the rising tide
Of outrage brings the barrage to a head
Of pressure fit to blow the top
Clean off their lie-machine. If what I’ve said
Strikes you as misconceived, just stop
And think: what might it take to power the jump
Of thought that comes to find it down-
Right flat unthinkable, the fact of Trump
As president, or such a clown,
Crook, liar, narcissist, and imbecile
As placed to launch the nukes and wipe
Us all out should he some day wake and feel
That way inclined. If you’re the type
Who says ‘That’s how things are – just learn to live
With it’, then I’ve no further bone
To pick with you or argument to give,
Beyond what I’ve already shown,
As ample grounds for rising up against
This monster and his entourage
Of conspecifics. But if you’re incensed
To think of it, then let this charge
Your anger-levels up until the stress
Arrives at breaking-point and thus
Makes way for actions that alone express
Thoughts once too painful to discuss.
Author Note
Chris Norris is Emeritus Professor in Philosophy at the University of Cardiff. He is the author or editor of more than forty academic books on aspects of philosophy, literature, the history of ideas, politics, and music. Among his chief interests are the poetry and criticism of William Empson and the writings of Jacques Derrida and Alain Badiou. He has also published a number of poetry collections: The Cardinal’s Dog; For the Tempus-Fugitives; The Matter of Rhyme; A Partial Truth; As Knowing Goes; The Winnowing Fan; Hedgehogs: verse reflections after Derrida; Damaged Life: poems after Adorno’s Minima Moralia; Socrates at Verse; Recalibrating and Other Poems; After Rilke: renderings, parodies, rejoinders and animadversions; and A Listener and Other Poems about Music. His political verse has appeared in three volumes: The Trouble with Monsters, The Folded Lie, and Convulsions, 2021-24: a Trusstercluck. ‘Aerogel: a quintain’ was published in the September 2022 number of Scientific American. A previous verse-collection of his was a Times Literary Supplement ‘Book of the Year’ (Terry Eagleton’s choice) and he has now become a leading figure in the currently very active and innovative field of Creative Criticism.